AMSOIL
Wins Head-to-Head Dyno Test
HAT DO YOU KNOW about the oil in your car's engine? From the ads,
you're led to believe the most exotic part of a Ferrari's engine is in
the sump," writes Fast Fours and Rotaries (FFR) (July 1998), an
Australian performance car journal.
The basic concept of oil is to provide a film of lubrication between
two surfaces," FFR continues, "reducing friction, wear and heat and
ensuring an engine's long life span. But the reality is that while all
claim to be superior, there are some that are better than others. We
decided to test most of the major brands to see how the well-known
brands, the ones most of us can readily buy, shape up in a real-life
engine test."
Test Procedure
FFR chose to test only high quality synthetic oils. High quality
synthetics are each oil makers' top product and high quality synthetics
are "most relevant" to performance enthusiasts. The testers ran each
oil through a "short yet grueling" dynamometer session followed by
professional oil analysis.
Sam Blumenstein, of COME Racing, performed the dyno testing on his
SuperFlow engine dynamometer using a mildly modified five liter V8.
Bill Reid, of Lubrication Management, performed the oil analyses. Ryco
supplied oil filters.
After establishing baseline performance using a mineral oil, the test
team subjected the test oils to three timed sessions at high engine
loads, between each of which were three full-power runs.
"The intent," says FFR, "was to establish a number of criteria.
Firstly, whether any of the oils would improve horsepower; whether any
of the products would lose viscosity; evaluate (the) ability (or lack
thereof) to prematurely wear components or suffer from discoloration.
As it turned out, discoloration didn't prove to be a factor.
We approached ten oil suppliers/manufacturers, informing them of our
intention, and all were reasonably keen and eager to be involved,
although Pennzoil didn't want to commit and Penrite flat out said no --
a little strange given this company has actually advertised with and
for this (performance) market."
Viscosity Test
FFR first subjected the oils to a test of viscosity retention. "Note,"
writes FFR, "that being such a short test it was felt that none of the
oils would lose any of its viscosity rating, and indeed six oils
suffered an inconsequential loss of less than one percent." The other
five, Torco MPZ, Shell Helix Ultra, Shell Helix Plus, Hi-Tec HTO and
Castrol R suffered significant viscosity losses.
AMSOIL Series 2000 Synthetic 20W-50 Racing Oil: No
Viscosity Loss Reported
|
Oil
|
Product
|
Viscosity Loss %
|
Type
|
Test #
|
|
Torco
|
MPZ
|
18%
|
Synthetic
|
5 & 6
|
|
Shell
|
Helix Ultra
|
14%
|
Synthetic
|
8
|
|
Shell
|
Helix Plus
|
12%
|
Petroleum
|
1
|
|
Hi-Tec
|
HTO
|
8%
|
Synthetic
|
9
|
|
Castrol
|
R
|
6%
|
Synthetic
|
12
|
FFR points out that the loss of viscosity suffered by the five oils was
very rapid. "Under normal conditions it's suggested oil which loses
viscosity this quickly would be subject to significant losses over 5000
km (8045 mile). Indeed, one would be suspect of the potential for
increased wear over this period."
Wear Metal Test
Oils inhibit wear by inhibiting metal to metal contact of engine parts.
To test each oil's ability to protect parts from contact and wear, FFR
subjected each oil to a test of wear metal generation. Their test
"indicates the size and number of wear particles for each oil. The
higher the rating (larger number) the greater the number and size of
wear particles," writes FFR.
AMSOIL Series 2000 Synthetic 20W-50 Racing Oil: Lowest
Wear Metal Generation
|
Rating
|
Oil
|
Average Particle Size
|
Overall (micron)
|
Test #
|
|
#1
|
AMSOIL
Series 2000
|
5 - 10 micron
|
5 to 50 micron
|
10
|
|
#2
|
Hi-Tec HTO
|
15 - 20 micron
|
10 to 60 micron
|
9
|
|
#3
|
BP Visco 5000
|
15 - 20 micron
|
15 to 60 micron
|
4
|
|
#4
|
Shell Helix Ultra
|
15 - 25 micron
|
15 to 60 micron
|
8
|
|
#5
|
Shell Helix Plus
|
10 - 20 micron
|
15 to 50 micron
|
1
|
|
#6
|
Mobil 1 5W-50
|
20 - 25 micron
|
15 to 60 micron
|
3
|
|
#7
|
Mobil 1 0W-40
|
15 - 20 micron
|
15 to 50 micron
|
11
|
|
#8
|
Castrol R
|
20 - 30 micron
|
15 to 100 micron
|
12
|
|
#9
|
Torco
|
15 - 20 micron
|
15 to 100 micron
|
5 & 6
|
|
#10
|
Royal Purple
|
15 - 20 micron
|
15 to 100 micron
|
7
|
|
#11
|
Castrol SLX
|
20 - 25 micron
|
15 to 100 micron
|
2
|
Horsepower
FFR averaged three runs per oil, noting power figures at 500 rpm
increments between 3000 and 5000 rpm and noting peak power and torque.
While the engine FFR used for testing was a large toleranced engine for
which a 20W-50 grade oil is ideal, some of the oil manufacturers
supplied 0W-30 grade oils for testing. The low grade viscosity oils
delivered somewhat greater horsepower than the high grade oils did, but
as FFR notes, "around 4000 rpm the power produced is very similar
across the range, and it's only really at the top end where there are
substantial differences. That said, the AMSOIL (20W-50), Castrol R
(10W-60) and Mobil 5W-50 prove themselves very well."
Conclusion
"Although we've provided criteria to pick and choose an oil, the
stand-out to us appears to be AMSOIL,
rating well in the viscosity and producing good horsepower.
"With the variety of grades, use this test as a guide but always follow
the manufacturers recommendation. But if we were to stick our neck out
in the anticipation of the law suits, from the information we gathered
specific to the supplied oils in this test, we'd rate the oils in the
following order:
-
AMSOIL
-
BP Visco 5000
-
Mobil 1
-
Mobil 1
-
Hi-Tec HTO
-
Shell Helix Ultra
-
Royal Purple
-
Castrol R
-
Castrol SLX
-
Torco"
Other Dynomometer Test Results from Past Years.
|